Interpreting Results

DISCLAIMER: Medical care of patients with epilepsy is a complex task that requires integration of numerous different test results, and multi-disciplinary collaboration among clinicians. Epilepsy diagnosis and seizure localization should use all information available to the clinician, and SPECT results are only one part of the diagnostic evaluation, which need to be interpreted by the clinician in the broader context of other data. The image analysis methods described on this site are intended for research purposes, to enable the investigation of how to best interpret SPECT results in epilepsy. The developers of this web site, ISAS, and the Yale Epilepsy Research Group are not responsible for clinical decisions made by others using SPECT results.

Summary of ISAS Interpretation

Details of ISAS interpretation are described in McNally et al., 2005. In summary:

  1. For true ictal SPECT (i.e. SPECT injection performed before the end of the seizure), localization should be based on the location of a positive region showing CBF increases using the “Reading rules” below.
  2. For post-ictal SPECT (i.e. SPECT injection performed after the end of the seizure), localization cannot reliably be done, but the hemisphere of onset can be lateralized based on the hypoperfusion asymmetry index.

Reading Rules

Reading rules for interpretation of SPECT analysis (taken from McNally, et al, 2005). Criteria for interpreting SPECT results were established aimed at identifying a single positive region whenever possible. The interpretation consisted of first identifying the most significant cluster of contiguous voxels, referred to as a “positive cluster.” Next, the region (lobe) identified by this cluster was identified, and referred to as a “positive region.” The following criteria were used:

  1. A cluster of voxels was considered positive if it was:
    1. Significant at the cluster level (corrected significance level p<0.05)
    2. Most significant at the cluster level (lowest corrected p value)
    3. Rules for ties: In the case of tied P values, then both clusters were considered positive.
  2. A region (lobe) was considered positive if:
    1. It contained the majority of the voxels from a positive cluster.
    2. Rules for ties: If a positive cluster involved 2 or more regions equally, then all involved regions were considered positive.

Example Interpretation for Sample Patient

For the Sample Patient (patient #2 from McNally et al., 2005), the seizure duration was 153s, and the injection took place 84s after seizure onset (69s before seizure end), so this was a true ictal injection.

  • Therefore, the localization should be based on CBF increases using the "Reading rules" above. According to the coronal slices and statistics for Hyperperfusion in the Sample Patient, there was one cluster with corrected cluster level significance p<0.05, and this was also the most significant cluster (corrected cluster level significance P<0.001 in the statistics table). To review these results more closely refer to the sample analysis page.
  • In the coronal slices, the lobe containing the majority of the hyperperfusion voxels for the most significant cluster was located in the right temporal lobe.
  • To determine this information you can click "Set Crosshair" button of the most significant cluster in the statistics table, and the cursor will move to the corresponding cluster on the Transform Viewer. Based on the coronal sections, the majority of the voxels for the most significant cluster in the Sample Patient are located in the right temporal lobe. Therefore, the localization based on ISAS for this patient is in the right temporal lobe.

Back to Using Rview || Jump to Top || Forward to Hypo-Asymm. Index